Convergence and Divergence in Post-Cold War British, French, and German Military Reforms: Between International Structure and Executive Autonomy
Dyson, T (2008) Convergence and Divergence in Post-Cold War British, French, and German Military Reforms: Between International Structure and Executive Autonomy Security Studies, 17 (4). 725 - 774. ISSN 0963-6412
Available under License : See the attached licence file.
|Plain Text (licence)|
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09636410802507990
Post-Cold War military reforms in Britain, France and Germany have been characterized by patterns of convergence in the objectives, instruments and institutional forums of defense policy, but by divergence in temporality. These patterns of convergence and divergence cannot be fully explained by cultural approaches. Neither can they be explained solely by a focus on the role of ‘international structure’, as neo-realism posits, although the post-Cold War distribution of capabilities is driving Britain, France and Germany towards policy convergence. Instead the analysis builds upon the insights of neoclassical realism and its emphasis upon ‘state power’ by demonstrating the important intervening role played by domestic material power relationships in incentivizing figures within the core executive to respond to systemic power shifts. The article argues that in Britain and France ‘executive autonomy’ in defense policy, resulting from the unitary state, weak linkages between defense and social policy subsystems and formal powers of the core executive in defense has allowed policy leaders to focus on the ‘national interest’ and convergence with ‘systemic imperatives’. In Germany the federal system and linkages between social and defense policy circumscribed ‘executive autonomy’ in defense policy and incentivized an acute concern within the core executive about the domestic political ramifications of convergence with systemic imperatives, leading to the temporal management of reform, producing short-medium term policy stasis. Culture emerges not so much as a cause of action as instrumental and a resource for policy leaders in the domestic political and temporal management of reform.
|Additional Information:||This is an electronic version of an article published in Security Studies, 17 (4), 725-774, December 2008. Security Studies is available online at: www.tandfonline.com with the open URL of http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09636410802507990.|
|Uncontrolled Keywords:||ARMED-FORCES, AIR POWER, FRANCE, BACK, NATO, US, SECURITIZATION, DOCTRINE, CULTURE, WARFARE|
|Divisions:||Faculty of Arts and Human Sciences > Politics|
|Deposited By:||Symplectic Elements|
|Deposited On:||02 Dec 2011 14:35|
|Last Modified:||30 Mar 2013 14:47|
Repository Staff Only: item control page