Engagement, representativeness and legitimacy in the development of food and nutrition policy
Timotijevic, L, Barnett, J and Raats, MM (2011) Engagement, representativeness and legitimacy in the development of food and nutrition policy Food Policy, 36 (4). 490 - 498. ISSN 0306-9192
ENGAGEMENT REPRESENTATIVENESS AND LEGITIMACY IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF FOOD AND NUTRITION POLICY.pdf
Available under License : See the attached licence file.
Plain Text (licence)
In a policy environment that contains structures to enable public engagement, the validity of expressions of public opinion and concern are in part legitimated through constructions of their representativeness. The current paper examined the ways in which various organisations involved in food and nutrition policy development negotiated the legitimacy of their inclusion in policy processes through claims about who they represented and how, with a specific focus upon older people (aged 60+) as an example of the “hard to reach”. This study is set in the context of theoretical considerations around the forms of representativeness that have been identified in the literature. A thematic analysis of 52 interviews with organisations and stakeholders active in the area of food and nutrition policy in England, UK explores these competing modalities of representation and how they are used both to claim legitimacy for self and to discount the claims of others. Different scripts of representation are deployed by various stakeholders and there is evidence of the strategic and the simultaneous deployment of different representativeness claims. The notions of expert representativeness permeate other modalities of representativeness, suggesting that the dominant framework for food and nutrition policy development is based upon technocratic models of decision-making. This highlights the way in which public views can be distanced from the framing of policy questions.
|Additional Information:||NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Food Policy. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Food Policy, 36 (4), May 2011, DOI 10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005. Elsevier.|
|Divisions:||Faculty of Arts and Human Sciences > Psychology|
|Depositing User:||Symplectic Elements|
|Date Deposited:||01 Dec 2011 17:34|
|Last Modified:||23 Sep 2013 18:54|
Actions (login required)
Downloads per month over past year