University of Surrey

Test tubes in the lab Research in the ATI Dance Research

European Consensus and the Evolutive Interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights

Dzehtsiarou, K (2011) European Consensus and the Evolutive Interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights German Law Journal, 12 (10). pp. 1730-1745.

[img] PDF (licence)
SRI_deposit_agreement.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (33kB)
[img] PDF (deleted)
leg and future.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License : See the attached licence file.

Download (156kB)
[img] PDF
PDF_Vol_12_No_10_1730-1745_Articles_Dzehtsiarou.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License : See the attached licence file.

Download (208kB)

Abstract

It is widely accepted that evolutive interpretation is necessary to keep European human rights effective and up to date. This concept supposes that the rules the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) applies can be changed over time. These changes, no matter how necessary they are, undermine the procedural legitimacy of the judgments. European consensus is a tool of interpretation that adds predictability and consistency into the case law. European consensus, while limiting the ECtHR’s ability to change, is not absolute and can be disregarded by the ECtHR if there are reasons for doing so. This paper illustrates two extreme points of view on the legitimacy of evolutive interpretation and European consensus. Lord Hoffmann argues that the ECtHR is lacking legitimacy to dynamically interpret the norms of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) up to the inclusion of new rights; the ECtHR should only reflect what the Contracting Parties consented to. Judge Zupančič of the ECtHR maintains that European consensus and the State’s consent are much less relevant for the decision-making process in the ECtHR. The paper aims to find a middle ground between these two extremes. It is argued that European consensus has a legitimizing potential to support the contested legitimacy of evolutive interpretation.

Item Type: Article
Authors :
AuthorsEmailORCID
Dzehtsiarou, KUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Date : 1 October 2011
Uncontrolled Keywords : Evolutive interpretation, European consensus, European Court of Human Rights, Legal reasoning
Depositing User : Symplectic Elements
Date Deposited : 28 Mar 2017 14:39
Last Modified : 28 Mar 2017 14:39
URI: http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/id/eprint/216669

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year


Information about this web site

© The University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, United Kingdom.
+44 (0)1483 300800