University of Surrey

Test tubes in the lab Research in the ATI Dance Research

Beyond Consensus: An Alternative use of Delphi Enquiry in Hospitality Research

Paraskevas, A and Saunders, MNK (2012) Beyond Consensus: An Alternative use of Delphi Enquiry in Hospitality Research International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management. ISSN 0959-6119

[img]
Preview
PDF (licence)
SRI_deposit_agreement.pdf

Download (32Kb)
[img]
Preview
PDF
Policy%20Delphi%20_Accepted_.pdf

Download (180Kb)

Abstract

Purpose – To critically review the use of Delphi techniques in qualitative research for utilising ‘expert’ opinions and to explore through a detailed example, how Policy Delphi can be used by hospitality researchers as an alternative to the more widely used Normative Delphi. Design/methodology/approach – This paper reflects on the research methodology of a project that explored organisational crisis signals detection using Policy Delphi with a criterion sample comprising 16 senior hotel executives involved in crisis management. Findings – The main methodological concerns regarding Delphi are the definition of consensus, the expertise of the panel, its lack of scientific rigour, and -due to its lack of uniformity- reliability and validity of findings. Policy Delphi by default addresses the first since it does not seek consensus and can, through its design and execution, address the remaining concerns. Research limitations/implications – Carefully designed Policy Delphi can offer a powerful research tool for exploratory research in hospitality, particularly for development of policies and strategies within an organisation. Unlike Normative Delphi, it is not intended as a decision making tool, but rather as a tool to generate options and suggest alternative courses of action for consideration. Originality/value – The paper presents a valuable research tool that has evaded the attention of many hospitality researchers offering an illustrative example of its use in exploratory research to deliver credible, transferable and confirmable findings.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: Volume, issue and pagination details to be updated when available . This article is © Emerald Group Publishing and permission has been granted for this version to appear here. Emerald does not grant permission for this article to be further copied/distributed or hosted elsewhere without the express permission from Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Divisions: Faculty of Business, Economics and Law > Surrey Business School
Depositing User: Symplectic Elements
Date Deposited: 27 Mar 2012 08:58
Last Modified: 23 Sep 2013 19:06
URI: http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/id/eprint/182705

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year


Information about this web site

© The University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, United Kingdom.
+44 (0)1483 300800