University of Surrey

Test tubes in the lab Research in the ATI Dance Research

RCGP Quality Team Development programme: an illuminative evaluation

Desombre, TR, Macfarlane, F, Greenhalgh, T and Scofield, T (2004) RCGP Quality Team Development programme: an illuminative evaluation Quality and Safety in Health Care, 13 (5). pp. 356-362.

[img] PDF
RCGPQualityTeamDevelopmentProgramme.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License : See the attached licence file.

Download (1MB)
[img] PDF (licence)
SRI_deposit_agreement.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (33kB)

Abstract

Background: There is increasing interest in quality initiatives that are locally owned and delivered, team based, multiprofessional, and formative. The Royal College of General Practitioners’ Quality Team Development (QTD) programme is one such initiative aimed at developing primary healthcare teams and their services. Aims: To evaluate QTD from the perspective of participants and assessors. Setting: UK primary health care. Design and method: Twelve of 14 practices and all four primary care organisations (PCOs) approached agreed to participate. Thirty four semi-structured interviews were conducted with key stakeholders. The interviews were taped, transcribed, and analysed using the constant comparative method. Results: The QTD programme appears to be highly valued by participating organisations. Practice based respondents perceived it as acceptable and feasible, and reported positive changes in teamwork and patient services. They valued its formative, participative, and multiprofessional nature, especially the peer review element. PCOs saw QTD as a method of delivering on prevailing national policies on clinical quality and modernisation agendas as well as promoting interorganisational collaboration. The main concerns raised were the workload, particularly for assessors, and maintaining the quality of the assessments and the programme. Conclusion: This qualitative study suggests positive benefits for participants in the QTD programme. However, such practices are a self-selecting innovative minority. Further research is needed on more typical practices to identify barriers to their participation in QTD or other formative, team based quality improvement programmes.

Item Type: Article
Divisions : Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences > Surrey Business School
Authors :
AuthorsEmailORCID
Desombre, TRUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Macfarlane, FUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Greenhalgh, TUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Scofield, TUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Date : 2004
Identification Number : https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2003.009332
Additional Information : This article has been accepted for publication in Quality and Safety in Health Care (QSHC). The definitive copyedited, typeset version, Qual Saf Health Care 2004;13:356-362 doi:10.1136/qshc.2003.009332, is available online at : http://qshc.bmj.com
Depositing User : Symplectic Elements
Date Deposited : 28 Mar 2017 15:03
Last Modified : 28 Mar 2017 15:03
URI: http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/id/eprint/182695

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year


Information about this web site

© The University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, United Kingdom.
+44 (0)1483 300800